In the first
step of the video states you want to let the person being interviewed do most
of the talking and to not interrupt them so that they may use their own words
and memory. The article is somewhat in line with the video, but the video never
talks about advising, requesting, ensuring, or having them face a blank wall or
closing your eyes to recall specific events like the article does. The article requests
that they tell you everything no matter how minor, advises them that they may
mention anything that comes to mind even if out of context or chronological
order, ensures complete privacy throughout the interview, and asks the subject
to face a blank wall (or close their eyes) as this will help them recall
specifics about the incident.
The second step
of the video asks the interviewee to remember specifics before the event. This
step is where they suggest they close their eyes and remember specifics. This
is in line with the article which reconstructs all aspects of the scene
"mentally" using questions to help them visualize who, what, where,
when, why and how like for example time of day, day of week, general
location, environment, specific location, distances.
The video never
mentions anything about the other three steps like the article does. The
article goes into further breakdown having adding three more steps to the
process which are conducting a free-format interview, reverse order, which is
having the subject recall his/her statement in reverse chronological order, or a
change perspective which is having the witness mentally put themselves in the
shoes of someone else, or put themselves in a different area of the scene and
tell you what happened. What the video does do is combine these steps into 2
steps which are the only steps in the video. The video and articles have the
same principles, but the video just combines everything into two steps instead of
five.
No comments:
Post a Comment